![]() | |||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
0151 - First things first - 2020.08.24 |
||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Comment: I remember, years ago, I was in a D&D group, and the GM was constantly frustrated that I wasn't optimizing my character for combat. This was one of those groups that had a player who did optimize himself for combat, and a Dungeon Master that allowed and encouraged it, so naturally, his character was effectively two or three levels ahead of the rest of the party, and every combat was starring him with the rest of us as largely unnecessary backup. When I expressed that I didn't know how to optimize my character, I was pointed in the direction of an online guide that showed the correct sequence of skills and feats and equipment to take. I pointed out that, if the guide told me the correct sequence, I, the player, didn't need to be involved at all - the GM could simply make my character for me. This suggestion did not go over well. Anyway, what I'm saying is, I understand Lee in this moment. If there is a correct sequence of things to do, why can't they just abdicate their responsibilities, let the AIs handle it, and be left alone? New technology is meant to be labour-saving, after all, and what could be more laborious than managing one's own life? |
||
Transcript: --------------------------------------------------------------- |
||