0048 - I know that I know nothing. - 2018.09.03 |
||
Comment: Once again - can't stress this enough - Pamela Zimmerman is a human with biomods. And again - can't stress this enough - it's Zoa that's an unusual distraction. I do think Orb's doing a good job at being engaging, despite these distractions. They've certainly got the attention and participation of the class, which is probably why this is a class that you have to take in meatspace. Objectivity and open-mindedness are the goal of philosophers who fancy themselves Socrates' heirs, but I've come to think of them as illusory. You can't ever not be where you're from. If a topic is actually important to you, you'll already have an opinion on it. No one is a tabula rasa. Prejudices and subconscious biases can never be truly eliminated, only uncovered and compensated for. Scenarios in which people actually have their minds changed by reasoned debate are vanishingly rare. When I was a younger man, I certainly had fantasies that I could be blank-slate-objective, and go on to logically derive truth from the universe. The more I've had exposure to other philosophies, though - which is to say, exposure to other people - the more I understand that Socrates' statement of knowing nothing is little more than faux-humble posturing and blame-dodging ("You're not disagreeing with me, you're disagreeing with logic!"). Presumably, if there ever were a belief system that is perfectly derived from pure logic, one could simply raise a child (or an AI) in isolation, and they'd all converge on that single universally true belief system. There is a reason this is not done. |
||
Transcript: --------------------------------------------------------------- |
||